13th International Conference on Fracture June 16–21, 2013, Beijing, China -9- 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 (a/b) 0 =0.08 (a/b) 0 =1.00 a/D f m=2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 (a/b) 0 =0.08 (a/b) 0 =1.00 m=2 a/D f Figure 8. Evolution of the dimensionless compliance f with crack growth (represented by the relative crack depth a/D) for m=2, starting from different initial crack geometries under tension loading (left) and bending moment (right) 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 (a/b) 0 =0.08 (a/b) 0 =1.00 m=3 a/D f 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 (a/b) 0 =0.08 (a/b) 0 =1.00 m=3 a/D f Figure 9. Evolution of the dimensionless compliance f with crack growth (represented by the relative crack depth a/D) for m=3, starting from different initial crack geometries under tension loading (left) and bending moment (right) 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 (a/b) 0 =0.08 (a/b) 0 =1.00 m=4 a/D f 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 (a/b) 0 =0.08 (a/b) 0 =1.00 m=4 a/D f Figure 10. Evolution of the dimensionless compliance f with crack growth (represented by the relative crack depth a/D) for m=4, starting from different initial crack geometries under tension loading (left) and bending moment (right)
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjM0NDE=